> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Schumacher [mailto:michael.schumacher AT pamas DOT de]
> Sent: den 22 april 2016 11:04
> To: General list for user discussion, questions and support <backuppc-
> users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
> Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4
>
> SS> I hope it's not off-topic on this particular list, but what
alternatives do
> SS> we have, that are as easy to install and maintain as BPC?
>
> why would you need an alternative? BackupPC is a mature product. I do
> not miss any features. Just use it.
> In fact, I appreciate the fact that it is not evolving to a feature
> monster over time.
Hi there!
In retrospect I realise I should have written something about that in my
previous post. 8-)
I any case, I have no problem with using old software.
Just because BPC isn't apparently maintained anymore, doesn't mean it will
suddenly stop working.
However, it's a so-so feeling using a software that's been for all practical
purposes abandoned for many years now.
Don't misunderstand me, BPC works just fine over here.
I'm just looking ahead and mulling over what to do whenever, and if, e.g.
CentOS 6/7/8+ stops BPC from working because of missing libs and/or other
dependencies.
--
//Sorin
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager
Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of
your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and
reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z _______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
| 