Re: [BackupPC-users] simple backup scheme, 1xfull, 6xinc
2013-10-04 15:12:46
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 1:42 PM, µicroMEGAS <micromegas AT mail333 DOT com>
wrote:
>>>
> I think here's my problem: let's say one or two host were not able to be
> backed up (incremental) Then I miss one or more incremental backups, so
> BackupPC doesn't delete the last Full after 7 days (when the new Full
> backup occurs). How can avoid that scenario? Should I decrease the
> FullIncrKeep to something lower? Any help appreciated.
If you don't need all 6 incrementals, lowering IncrKeepCnt and
IncrKeepCntMin will allow the backing fulls to be deleted sooner.
But, it will give you a shorter time that you could go back if you
don't realize immediately that you need to restore something.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134791&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
|
Previous by Date: |
Re: [BackupPC-users] simple backup scheme, 1xfull, 6xinc, µicroMEGAS |
Next by Date: |
Re: [BackupPC-users] simple backup scheme, 1xfull, 6xinc, Timothy J Massey |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: [BackupPC-users] simple backup scheme, 1xfull, 6xinc, µicroMEGAS |
Next by Thread: |
Re: [BackupPC-users] simple backup scheme, 1xfull, 6xinc, Timothy J Massey |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|