BackupPC-users

Re: [BackupPC-users] serial or parallel backups

2011-06-27 17:01:28
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] serial or parallel backups
From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com>
To: backuppc-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:59:44 -0500
On 6/27/2011 3:40 PM, Dan Pritts wrote:

>
> Multiple I/O streams can probably make better use of your I/O bandwidth than 
> can a single serial one, unless you are running on low-end hardware like a 
> USB drive.
>

One other point that I don't think has been mentioned yet is that if you 
have configured only one concurrent backup, something that slows down a 
single host like a big upgrade or set of new files to the point where it 
takes the whole backup window will cause the backups scheduled later to 
be missed.   A little more obviously, if you are running some remote 
backups over slow links you probably want them to run concurrently with 
local runs since their disk use will be throttled by the bandwidth limit.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security 
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes 
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/