BackupPC-users

Re: [BackupPC-users] Re-request: "finish all backups and stop".

2011-02-13 11:00:44
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Re-request: "finish all backups and stop".
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell AT digitalkingdom DOT org>
To: "General list for user discussion, questions and support" <backuppc-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 07:58:21 -0800
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 10:29:12PM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 2/12/11 9:46 PM, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> >
> > Would be Soooooo handy.
> 
> But what would it mean?  And what if one or more of the targets is
> unavailable and you never stop the retries and thus never finish?

I mean finish all *currently running* backups, and do not start any
others at all.  If one currently running ends in failure, that's
fine; don't retry.

The point is to reach the server-off state without losing the 12
hours spent on the current backup, or whatever.

-Robin

-- 
http://singinst.org/ :  Our last, best hope for a fantastic future.
Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot
is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false"
is "na nei".   My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE:
Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen.
Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle.
Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>