On 5/25/2010 1:55 PM, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
>
>>> I don't know, but regardless there are always at least 5 of
>>> those, is what I'm saying.
>>
>> But are they the same 5?  If you simply can't transfer the amount
>> of data you have there's not much it can do but pick up where it
>> left off when wakes up outside of a blackout again.  As long as it
>> isn't the same jobs being missed repeatedly, it is probably going
>> to the to it as fast as you would if you adjust the schedule
>> anyway.
>
> It should take about 4 days to do all the jobs.  There's one job
> that is 10 days old.  Therefore I conclude that it's not doing the
> right thing.  :)

OK, agreed, but did you mention having some sort of custom lock that 
limits concurrency?  If that looks like a failure the job probably goes 
to the bottom of the list - and at startup, you would probably always 
fail most of the oldest jobs that try to start.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/