Re: [BackupPC-users] Copying BackupPC to tape for off-site storage - very slow
2010-03-02 13:13:58
> If you use a file-oriented approach, traversing the directories is very
> slow, and the restore will be much worse as it tries to reconstruct the
> hardlinks. An image copy will be much faster, but keep in mind that you
> have to load it all back from the tape before being able to access any
> of it. If your partition is 2TB or smaller it might be handier to image
> to to an external or removable disk that you could access directly.
We'll give this a shot. Our "tape drive" is actually an HP d2d4112
system, which creates a virtual tape changer and and tape drive.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
|
|
|