Hi
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 01:30:25 -0400, "Jeffrey J. Kosowsky" <backuppc AT kosowsky
DOT org> wrote:
> > well, under normal conditions (ie: unix), i would say rsyncd is
> > faster, as doesnt have the ssh overhead...
> But if bandwidth is your limitation (which it frequently is on any
> decent system) then rsync+ssh may be faster if there is a lot of fresh
> data to be transferred due to the compression of ssh transfers.
bandwidth is the limit if you can both encrypt and compress faster
than the network bandwidth... also, the bonus of the compression
depends of the data and can also be gained by the normal
rsync-rsyncd...
backuppc rsync cant because doesnt support compression, so
the main question might be how much the data compress
Cya
higuita
--
Naturally the common people don't want war... but after all it is the
leaders of a country who determine the policy, and it is always a
simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or
a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship.
Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of
the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are
being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and
exposing the country to danger. It works the same in every country.
-- Hermann Goering, Nazi and war criminal, 1883-1946
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
|
