BackupPC-users

Re: [BackupPC-users] Keeping servers in sync

2009-08-28 15:54:59
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Keeping servers in sync
From: Jim Wilcoxson <prirun AT gmail DOT com>
To: "General list for user discussion, questions and support" <backuppc-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:52:11 -0400
Hi Les - thanks for trying it out!

It sounds like you are seeing about 300GB in 1200 minutes, or 4
minutes per GB.  That's about what I see on average when backing up a
real system initially.  Yesterday I backed up 33GB on a G5 Mac (the
Mac version isn't released yet), and it took 110 minutes.

However, incrementals are much faster: The incremental for the same
Mac took 7 minutes.  One of my Linux development systems (about 1.5GB)
takes 4 minutes to backup initially, but only 20 seconds to do an
incremental when just a few things change.  I backup my /home/jim user
directory, about 1.5GB, every 15 minutes and it usually takes 5-10
seconds.

You can restart the same backup and it will pick backup up where it
left off after a short delay.

Thanks again for checking it out!  Much appreciated.

Jim

On 8/28/09, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
> Jim Wilcoxson wrote:
>> Michael - I have a new LInux/FreeBSD backup program, HashBackup, in
>> beta that I believe will handle a large backuppc server.  In tests, it
>> will backup a single directory with 15M (empty) files/hardlinks, with
>> 32000 hard links to each file, and can do the initial and  incremental
>> backups on this directory in about 45 minutes on a 2005 AMD box with
>> 1GB of memory.
>>
>> HashBackup can also send backups offsite via FTP, ssh accounts, or to
>> Amazon S3.  I'd be very interested in feedback if anyone would like to
>> try it on their BackupPC server.
>>
>> The beta site is:
>>
>> http://sites.google.com/site/hashbackup
>>
>> Of course, you're welcome to contact me via email with questions.
>
> What kind of speed would you expect from this on real files?  I let it
> run about 20 hours and it had only made it halfway through a pool of
> around 600 gigs (where an image copy of the partition takes a bit over 2
> hours).   Should incrementals be faster if it ever makes it though the
> first run?
>
> --
>   Les Mikesell
>     lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus
> on
> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
> Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
> _______________________________________________
> BackupPC-users mailing list
> BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
> List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
> Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
> Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
>


-- 
Software first.  Software lasts!

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/