Re: [BackupPC-users] Why is my rsync so much slower to do an incremental backup than tar over ssh?
2009-07-16 16:54:06
gimili writes:
> I switched back from tar to rsync. It sounds like rsync is far
> superior. I ran a full backup which took 302 minutes and then an
> incremental which only took 26 minutes. So it seems like things are
> working now as the incremental was much quicker. I am not sure what
> happened the first time. Hopefully it won't happen again. Thanks!
If you changed settings that affect what is backed up (eg: the share
names, BackupFilesOnly or BackupFilesExclude) after the full but before
the incremental then the incremental will have a lot more work to do.
If you make significant changes it's not a bad idea to manually run
a full backup.
As suggested already, inspecting the XferLOG files will tell you more
about why the first incremental took longer than you expected.
Craig
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time,
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have
the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize
details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
|
|
|