Amanda-Users

Re: 2.6.1 configure failure on Solaris 2.5

2009-02-10 16:05:29
Subject: Re: 2.6.1 configure failure on Solaris 2.5
From: stan <stanb AT panix DOT com>
To: "Dustin J. Mitchell" <dustin AT zmanda DOT com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:57:47 -0500
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 02:58:47PM -0500, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 10:29 AM, stan <stanb AT panix DOT com> wrote:
> > I am trying to build 2.6.1  (client only) on Solaris 2.6.1, and the
> > configure seems to go fine, but somehow correct Makefiles are not getting
> > generated. For instance line 15 in the top level Makefile looks like this:
> >
> > @SET_MAKE@
> >
> > If I recall correctly this would imply that m4 failed to make the correct
> > substitution, right?
> >
> > BTW, there are many of these, not just this one.
> >
> > Any thoughts as to what I can do to resolve this? Perhaps install the GNU
> > version of m4?
> 
> Actually, those substitutions are made by config.status, using sed.
> Are there any differences at all between Makefile.in and Makefile?
> 
Interesting. And to answer your question yes, for instance:

2c2
< # Makefile.  Generated from Makefile.in by configure.
---
> # @configure_input@
86c86

Strange.

I could send you a complete diff, if it would help?


-- 
One of the main causes of the fall of the roman empire was that, lacking
zero, they had no way to indicate successful termination of their C
programs.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>