Re: IPv6 Question
2008-01-28 08:14:35
Hi Eric,
Thanks for your reply, your advice helped me.
My mistake was that I didn't know about IPv6.....
I understood this problem to install the telnetd.
I mean, I had to specify the NIC Interface if i use the link-local address.
like this:
OK: $telnet fe80::215:c5ff:fe77:8c47%eth0
NG: $telnet fe80::215:c5ff:fe77:8c47
If I want to test the Amanda with link-local address, maybe I
require some creative thinking.
So, I instrumentally added the eth0 to other IPv6 address. It works.
Best Regards,
Yoshihiro.
On Jan 28, 2008 5:13 AM, Eric Schnoebelen <eric AT cirr DOT com> wrote:
>
> "Yoshihiro Ishikawa" writes:
> - I used
> - {{{
> - [root@fedora network-scripts]# more /etc/redhat-release
> - Fedora Core release 6 (Zod)
> - [amandabackup@fedora ~]$ amadmin xx version
> - build: VERSION="Amanda-2.5.2p1"
> - }}}
> -
> - I want to use the IPv6 with the Amanda, so now i test on only local backup.
> - But I regret to inform you that I don't have further knowledge about the IP
> - v6.
>
> [..]
>
> - But the next config is not working.
> -
> - #Pattern2:
> -
> - [disklist]
> - fedora_ipv6 /etc root-tar # USE IPV6
> -
> - [/etc/hosts]
> - fe80::215:c5ff:fe77:8c47 fedora_ipv6
> -
> - "fe80::215:c5ff:fe77:8c47" is the eth0 on the same host.
>
> What does the IPv6 routing table show? Does it show a host
> route of the systems local address pointing to the loopback
> (lo?) interface?
>
> On most systems, part of the networking initialization inserts
> host routes for the local host's addresses pointing at the
> loopback interface.
>
> I hope this helps,
> Eric
>
> --
> Eric Schnoebelen eric AT cirr DOT com
> http://www.cirr.com
> Einstein argued that there must be simplified explanations of
> nature, because God is not capricious or arbitrary. No such
> faith comforts the software engineer. -- Fred Brooks
>
|
|
|