On Tue, 22 May 2007, Brian Cuttler wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 04:07:32PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> > On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 03:10:02PM -0400, Brian Cuttler wrote:
> > >
> > > Jon,
> > >
> > > Think I found a good kit for 1.15.1, which seems to be on the
> > > "good" list at amanda.org.
> > >
> > > Unless you advise otherwise I will try to build using that version.
> > >
> >
> > It looks like 1.15.1 compiled easily on my Solaris 9 x86 box.
> > I've not used it with amanda however so I can't comment on that.
>
> 1.15.1 is the highest version that is listed a working on this
> page, so I'm keeping my fingers crossed.
>
> http://www.amanda.org/docs/faq.html#id347035
>
> Looks like it built ok, need to wait for the current amdump to
> complete before I install, would hate after all this time to
> fail on otherwise ok amdump run. Having the prefix in the file
> path is annoying, but in a pinch I can work with it if I have to.
I'm using 1.16 (from Debian) since a while. Seems to work fine (no
restore done so far, though ;-)
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert AT linux-m68k
DOT org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
|