Amanda-Users

Re: Version 2.5.0: Have incronly/skip-fill issues been addressed

2006-06-13 10:36:52
Subject: Re: Version 2.5.0: Have incronly/skip-fill issues been addressed
From: Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT com>
To: Amanda Mailing List <amanda-users AT amanda DOT org>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 10:28:02 -0400
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 11:46:20AM +0200, Paul Bijnens wrote:
> 
> I'm still finding out a use for "skip-full".  It seems to be a weird
> option:  when the planner had decided to make a full dump, then in
> the real run it is skipped.  That would mean that you have to be 
> carefully reading the report to know when to run a manual full
> dump of that DLE.  And until you do, you have no backup at all.
> Strange option...

Yeah, I've only used skip-incr (DLE's containing CD .iso images :)

But I recall way back someone reporting they tried to use it in
a two configuation setup.  The configs used many of the same
files (logs, index, ...) with the primary difference they used
different tape devices, one with much larger capacity than the
other.  The smaller capacity drive config used skip-full and/or
incr-only.  I forget which they settled upon.  The other config
used the opposite.

-- 
Jon H. LaBadie                  jon AT jgcomp DOT com
 JG Computing
 4455 Province Line Road        (609) 252-0159
 Princeton, NJ  08540-4322      (609) 683-7220 (fax)