Amanda-Users

Re: WARNING: tapecycle (6) <= runspercycle (6).

2006-01-07 12:59:53
Subject: Re: WARNING: tapecycle (6) <= runspercycle (6).
From: Ian Turner <ian AT zmanda DOT com>
To: Tony van der Hoff <tony AT vanderhoff DOT org>
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 12:54:16 -0500
On Saturday 07 January 2006 12:38 pm, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> WARNING: tapecycle (6) <= runspercycle (6).

What this means, is that if a dump ever fails (bad tape, network problems, 
etc.), there is a chance that you will have no backup at all.

If tapecycle == dumpcycle, then you are overwriting your very last dump each 
time, which is not very safe. Better to have tapecycle be at least double 
dumpcycle, so that you have a spare backup if the one you are erasing has any 
problem.

Cheers,

--Ian
-- 
Zmanda: Open Source Data Protection and Archiving.
        http://www.zmanda.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>