Re: Hanging back-up.
2005-09-13 14:56:25
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 13:53 -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 06:01:37PM +0200, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 11:50 +0200, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> > > I Have had a back-up active since 1 o'clock (this night). When I issue
> > > amstatus I can see that it is still active although apparently doing
> > > nothing. It reports one dumper busy with "no-bandwidth". What ican my
> > > problem be and what is this "no-bandwidth"?
> >
> > I am still puzzled by the "no-bandwidth" report. I do not use network
> > backup so I believe I have oodles of bandwidth. Does amanda have a bug
> > reporting system that I could search for possible bugs in this area?
>
>
> Every amanda backup is a "network" backup. I.e. client -> host.
> That still uses part of the network stack I believe.
OK.
>
> >
> ...
> > > 4 dumpers idle : not-idle
> > > taper idle
> > > network free kps: 2000
> > > holding space : 3313820k (100.00%)
> > > dumper0 busy : 2:26:38 ( 88.61%)
> > > taper busy : 0:18:07 ( 10.95%)
> > > 0 dumpers busy : 0:18:49 ( 11.38%) not-idle: 0:17:45
> > > ( 94.32%)
> > > start-wait: 0:01:04 (
> > > 5.68%)
> > > 1 dumper busy : 2:26:39 ( 88.62%) no-bandwidth: 2:04:42
> > > ( 85.03%)
> > > not-idle: 0:20:01
>
>
> I'm on shakey ground here. This is not a report of the current state, but
> how things went during the run. Seems like you would allow 4 dumpers max.
> There were times when it could have gone to a second dumper but was
> unable to do so. The it gives the reasons, only one in yours, multiple
> in Guy's report in the message that follows your in my mailer.
>
> What do you have netusage set to?
As mentioned in an earlier message, 600 kbps. However, I also have:
define interface local {
comment "a local disk"
use 1000 kbps
}
I have now cranked up the latter to 3000 kbps, so I'll see tonight how
that behaves.
>
--
Regards,
Erik P. Olsen
|
|
|