Amanda-Users

Re: "Wait for dumping" question

2005-05-24 12:19:27
Subject: Re: "Wait for dumping" question
From: Eric Dantan Rzewnicki <rzewnickie AT rfa DOT org>
To: Ryan Pagquil <rpagquil AT philonline DOT com>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 12:08:56 -0400
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 03:13:13PM +0800, Ryan Pagquil wrote:
> Jon LaBadie wrote:
> >On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 02:23:21PM +0800, Ryan Pagquil wrote:
> >>Guys,
> >>  Who will be the responsible for the dump when the amanda said that 
> >>the host's status is "wait for dumping"?
> >If I understand correctly, you started a dump and while it was running
> >you ran amstatus.  The report from amstatus showed some DLEs "waiting
> >for dumping".
> >Probably totally normal.  If you had 1000 DLE's you would not want
> >them all dumping at the same time.  Something would overload.  So
> >amanda has several restraints on what DLE dumps when.  Max number
> >total running at the same time, max per host, max per spindle, ...
> >Plus there are priorities and other things that may affect when
> >a particular DLE gets dumped.  It is more important whether you
> >see it has been dumped when amdump has completed.
> so it is normal amanda do this. btw, what does DLE stands for... another 

http://www.amanda.org/docs/topten.html#id2554702

-- 
Eric Dantan Rzewnicki  |  Systems Administrator
Technical Operations Division  |  Radio Free Asia
2025 M Street, NW  |  Washington, DC 20036  |  202-530-4900
CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION
This e-mail message is intended only for the use of the addressee and
may contain information that is privileged and confidential. Any 
unauthorized dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly 
prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error, please contact
network AT rfa DOT org.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>