Amanda-Users
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: dumpcycle versus noinc

2005-03-16 13:07:15
Subject: Re: dumpcycle versus noinc
From: Gaby vanhegan <gaby AT vanhegan DOT net>
To: amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 17:53:57 +0000 

On 16 Mar 2005, at 13:26, Jon LaBadie wrote:
With dumpcycle 0, each DLE is scheduled for a level 0 each run of amdump. 

With "noinc", incrementals are scheduled and planned, just not done.
I.e. for a particular amdump run, nothing is done with that DLE if it is 
scheduled for an incremental.
So, this config will only be run on the first on the month and should do a full dump of all disks to tape. Should I just stick with dumpcycle 0 then? 

Gaby

--
Uganda Maximum - Enemy of the English Thrust
gaby AT vanhegan DOT net
http://weblog.vanhegan.net
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  RE: huge file showing up, Mark Lidstone
Next by Date:  Re: autoflush, Gaby vanhegan
Previous by Thread:  Re: dumpcycle versus noinc, Jon LaBadie
Next by Thread:  Re: dumpcycle versus noinc, Steve Wray
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]