Re: dumpcycle versus noinc
2005-03-16 08:35:35
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 12:57:22PM +0000, Gaby vanhegan wrote:
> Hello again!
>
> Whilst setting up a full dump configuration to do monthly full dumps to
> tape, I'm torn between either:
>
> strategy "noinc"
>
> or
>
> dumpcycle 0
>
> To do a full dump. What's the difference here? Does it matter which
> one I use?
Absolutely.
With dumpcycle 0, each DLE is scheduled for a level 0 each run of amdump.
With "noinc", incrementals are scheduled and planned, just not done.
I.e. for a particular amdump run, nothing is done with that DLE if it is
scheduled for an incremental.
An example of the latter; I have one DLE that is a directory tree of nothing
but CD .iso images. I can mount them online if I need without going to the
real CD. I even have scripts, mountimage and unmountimage to present me with
a menu of the available images and do the mounting when I choose a number.
The images don't change. I don't add/subtract images often. Nor is it much
of a loss if an image I added doesn't get backed up for a while. So I use a
dumptype with "noinc" and a dumpcycle of 2 weeks rather than my normal 1 week.
--
Jon H. LaBadie jon AT jgcomp DOT com
JG Computing
4455 Province Line Road (609) 252-0159
Princeton, NJ 08540-4322 (609) 683-7220 (fax)
|
|
|