Re: tuning dumpcycle, runspercycle, and tapecycle
2005-02-13 19:09:30
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 03:20:14PM -0800, David Newman wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Feb 2005, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> >On Sunday 13 February 2005 12:02, David Newman wrote:
>
> This isn't so good; again, I'm looking for one full dump and four
> incremental dumps on each tape. (FWIW, the server in question is at a
> remote location and we can't get to it every day.)
>
> Jon LaBadie's post on the Amanda top 10 list suggests that Amanda is not
> the right tool for this. Is there some way to do this using Amanda?
>
> If not, any recommendations for alternatives?
>
Jon LaBadie's post on the top 10 list also discusses the
most common alternative.
--
Jon H. LaBadie jon AT jgcomp DOT com
JG Computing
4455 Province Line Road (609) 252-0159
Princeton, NJ 08540-4322 (609) 683-7220 (fax)
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- tuning dumpcycle, runspercycle, and tapecycle, David Newman
- Re: tuning dumpcycle, runspercycle, and tapecycle, Gene Heskett
- Re: tuning dumpcycle, runspercycle, and tapecycle, David Newman
- Re: tuning dumpcycle, runspercycle, and tapecycle,
Jon LaBadie <=
- Re: tuning dumpcycle, runspercycle, and tapecycle, Gene Heskett
- Re: tuning dumpcycle, runspercycle, and tapecycle, Steve Wray
- Re: tuning dumpcycle, runspercycle, and tapecycle, Gene Heskett
|
Previous by Date: |
Re: Can tapes be grouped for different types of back-up?, Glenn English |
Next by Date: |
Re: tuning dumpcycle, runspercycle, and tapecycle, Gene Heskett |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: tuning dumpcycle, runspercycle, and tapecycle, David Newman |
Next by Thread: |
Re: tuning dumpcycle, runspercycle, and tapecycle, Gene Heskett |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|