Re: Permission problems with amlabel.
2005-01-23 01:11:16
On Sun, 2005-01-23 at 00:20 +0100, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-01-22 at 22:31 +0100, Paul Bijnens wrote:
> > Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> >
> > > [root@epo full]# su amanda -c "amlabel -f full full01"
> > > rewinding, reading label full01
> > > rewinding, writing label full01, checking labelamlabel: couldn't write
> > > tapelist: Permission denied
> > >
> > > Well, I thought it was permissions for the file tapelist and changed
> > > that to full permission, but still got the same error.
> > >
> > > I then saw syslog had the following message:
> > >
> > > Jan 22 21:13:39 epo su(pam_unix)[9298]: session opened for user amanda
> > > by erik(uid=0)
> > > Jan 22 21:13:39 epo su[9298]: Warning! Could not relabel /dev/pts/1
> > > with user_u:object_r:devpts_t, not relabeling.Operation not permitted
> > > Jan 22 21:13:39 epo su(pam_unix)[9298]: session closed for user amanda
> > >
> > > I have no idea whatsoever what this is all about. I would be grateful if
> > > someone would explain to me what the heck it is and how I can satisfy
> > > amlabel?
> >
> > FC3 ?
>
> Yes, I run FC3.
> >
> > The "relabel" in syslog has nothing to do with amlabel. You seem to
> > have SElinux enabled. You have a problem with "su" being restricted
> > by selinux.
>
> Very interesting. I have just today updated FC3 with some selinux
> packages. Perhaps they are the culprits.
>
> > The fastest way is to disable selinux in /etc/config/selinux -- this
> > needs a reboot.stuff
> > The better way is study selinux, and configure the system to allow
> > what you want. Studying takes a few days, at least...
>
> Maybe I should disable selinux until I understand how I can fix my
> problem. I am most anxious to start backing my system up.
>
I have now disabled selinux and the warning message about relabeling has
disappeared. However, amlabel still fails with the "Permission denied"
message.
--
Regards,
Erik P. Olsen
|
|
|