Amanda-Users

Re: Does this report look okay? ---> [Fwd: DailySet1 AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR February 9, 2004]

2004-02-09 11:54:17
Subject: Re: Does this report look okay? ---> [Fwd: DailySet1 AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR February 9, 2004]
From: Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT com>
To: amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 11:51:30 -0500
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 03:57:31PM +0100, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> 
> Amanda users,
> 
> do you see anything in below report that raises your eyebrows?
> This is just test, no production cycle yet.
> 
> -------------------------- --------------------------------- ------------
> u03          -xport/home 1   29370   3297  11.2   2:53  19.1   0:04 753.3
> u03          /opt        2  174590   9691   5.6   3:34  45.2   0:11 873.0
> u03          /usr        0  503910 158394  31.4  24:42 106.9   2:43 974.5
> u03          -sr/openwin 1     720     47   6.5   0:07   6.3   0:001149.1
> u03          /var        0  245600 129929  52.9  13:09 164.7   2:17 950.6
> u07          -xport/home 1    3670    140   3.8   0:03  45.0   0:002079.7
> u07          /home       1      10      1  10.0   0:00   0.0   0:00   4.0
> u07          /usr        1   15950   1635  10.3   0:28  58.4   0:17  95.5
> u07          /var        0   83740  36156  43.2   0:56 649.5   0:37 975.8
> 

Aside from what has already been noted;
you might read up on the "columnspec" setting to adjust the spacing
of your report columns.

I also go into the source and change the columns with single decimal digits
to having zero decimal digits and no decimal point.  Do I really care if
the tape rate was 975.8 KB/sec as compared to 976?  Or that u07's /var FS
compressed to 43.2 percent of its original size vs 43%?

-- 
Jon H. LaBadie                  jon AT jgcomp DOT com
 JG Computing
 4455 Province Line Road        (609) 252-0159
 Princeton, NJ  08540-4322      (609) 683-7220 (fax)