Amanda-Users

Re: Does this report look okay? ---> [Fwd: DailySet1 AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR February 9, 2004]

2004-02-09 11:05:33
Subject: Re: Does this report look okay? ---> [Fwd: DailySet1 AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR February 9, 2004]
From: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett AT verizon DOT net>
To: amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 11:03:25 -0500
On Monday 09 February 2004 10:57, Paul Bijnens wrote:
>Eugen Leitl wrote:
>> do you see anything in below report that raises your eyebrows?
>> This is just test, no production cycle yet.
>
>All fine.
>
>>   planner: Full dump of u03:/var promoted from 25 days ahead.
>
>Are you sure you want to run with a dumpcycle that large?
>Dumpcyle != tapecycle.  Actually tapecycle is best at least twice
>the dumpcycle.
>
>>                                      DUMPER STATS            TAPER
>> STATS HOSTNAME     DISK        L ORIG-KB OUT-KB COMP% MMM:SS  KB/s
>> MMM:SS  KB/s --------------------------
>> --------------------------------- ------------ u03         
>> -xport/home 1   29370   3297  11.2   2:53  19.1   0:04 753.3 u03  
>>        /opt        2  174590   9691   5.6   3:34  45.2   0:11
>> 873.0 u03          /usr        0  503910 158394  31.4  24:42 106.9
>>   2:43 974.5 u03          -sr/openwin 1     720     47   6.5  
>> 0:07   6.3   0:001149.1
>
>Have a look at the "colspec" parameter in amanda.conf.  It avoids
>running the columns together.  When going production, you numbers
> will even be larger.
>
>> (brought to you by Amanda version 2.4.4p1)
>
>2.4.4p2 is out too :-)

So is 2.4.5p1, works great here. :-)

-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
99.22% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com attornies please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2004 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.