Amanda-Users

Re: gnutar version -- exactly 1.13.25 or just 1.13.25 and above?

2003-12-16 19:44:41
Subject: Re: gnutar version -- exactly 1.13.25 or just 1.13.25 and above?
From: Eric Siegerman <erics AT telepres DOT com>
To: amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 19:41:17 -0500
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 05:51:51PM -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>  **  there still are no [gtar] point releases listed from 1.13.25 - 1.13.89 
> :))
>      yet 1.13.90 was followed five weeks later with 1.13.91 and a week
>      after that 1.13.92.

I've seen this before.  It seems to be a new(ish) convention for
labelling betas, the idea being that they're counting up towards
a 1.14 release.  I'm not sure what characteristics distinguish a
point release (final component starting with a low digit) from a
beta (yada yada high digit) -- or what they do if they need
another beta after 1.13.99.  I suppose both of those vary
per-project.

--

|  | /\
|-_|/  >   Eric Siegerman, Toronto, Ont.        erics AT telepres DOT com
|  |  /
Furthermore, if you do not like any of [the many standards from
which to choose], you can just wait for next year's model.
        - Andrew Tanenbaum