Amanda-Users

Re: Backing up via NFS.

2003-12-16 19:29:33
Subject: Re: Backing up via NFS.
From: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett AT verizon DOT net>
To: "Ken D'Ambrosio" <kend AT xanoptix DOT com>, "Dan L. Ostrom" <dostrom AT umich DOT edu>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 19:26:07 -0500
On Tuesday 16 December 2003 18:07, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
>Dan L. Ostrom wrote:
>>         I was then able to do an amcheck, and it succeeded. Doing
>> an amdump still
>> fails however. Looking into the log file (sendsize.-----.debug) it
>> indicated that
>> amdump is not receiving the size information (presumably from
>> sendsize module)
>> that it needs to complete the tar.
>
>Well, it looks like you'll have better luck than me.  In my poking
>around to find out what the answer to my issue was, I may have
> bumped into the answer to yours:
>"On SunOS 4.1.3, HP/UX and possibly other systems, GNU tar 1.12 will
>report incorrect output sizes, because printf does not understand
> '%llu'."
>
>The above is from http://www.amanda.org/patches, and has the patches
> to fix same.
>Note that there are also some issues with GNU tar 1.13, which are
> also addressed.
>
1.13 is busted, thats why we always recommend either 1.13-19 or 
1.13-25.

>-Ken
>
>>         It is bewildering that amcheck works, but amdump would
>> fail, but then
>> amanda was written to have clients out there, so this is a little
>> beyond it's
>> scope. I am not a C programmer, but I am going to continue to
>> *hack* at this
>> to try and get it to work.
>>
>>         If anyone else out there has already solved this problem,
>> please by
>> all means send the fix. I really don't need to re-invent the wheel
>>
>>         Thanks.
>>
>> At 09:15 AM 12/16/2003, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
>>> pll+amanda AT permabit DOT com wrote:
>>> > Try using GnuTar for your dump program instead. Running 'dump'
>>> > over
>>>
>>> an NFS
>>>
>>> > mount if it ever works, is likely to be frought with problems.
>>>
>>> Hey, Paul: yah; I'm already using tar instead of dump.
>>>
>>> > To compile amanda, you may well need to install a bunch of
>>> > things
>>>
>>> like gcc,
>>>
>>> > automake/autoconf, etc.
>>>
>>> Yeah.  It's actually the libraries, etc., that're giving me the
>>> most grief.  Guess it's time to hunker down and just get 'em all.
>>>
>>> > The other option might be attempting to cross-compile for HPUX
>>> > from
>>>
>>> Linux,
>>>
>>> > since Linux has all the necessary tools to begin with.
>>>
>>> True 'nuff, but I wouldn't know where to begin.  Think I'll take
>>> the "compile, darn you" approach.  Assuming I get it to work, is
>>> there anywhere that I should put the binaries and/or
>>> patches/HOWTO for public consumption?
>>>
>>> -Ken
>>>
>>> P.S.  I should explicitly thank Eric Schnoebelen as the guy who
>>> was kind enough to send me the patches for Amanda under HP/UX. 
>>> Thus far, I've seen nothing wrong with them, but rather with my
>>> "development" suite (ha!) under HP/UX.  See
>>> http://www.google.com/search?q=Amanda+HP%2FUX for the dialog.
>>
>> ############################################################
>> # Dan L. Ostrom                |  IT Contract Services     #
>> # Systems Administrator III    |  (734) 647-5664 (voice)   #
>> # University of Michigan       |  (734) 670-4001 pager)    #
>> # Ann Arbor Michigan           |  (734) 763-4050 (fax)     #
>> #  48109                       |                           #
>> ############################################################

-- 
Cheers, Gene
AMD K6-III@500mhz 320M
Athlon1600XP@1400mhz  512M
99.22% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com attornies please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2003 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>