moved to new disk, now amanda wants to do level 0's on whole system
2003-11-14 01:26:05
Greetings all;
See subject, Which of course is leading to a 90% failure rate as the
whole system has around 40Gb, but the tapes are only 4Gb's.
What happened is that I put in a new 120 Gb drive, 2x the size of the
one I took out, mainly because the root partition was full, and no
room to readjust things was available.
Although the /dev/whatevers have changed, the mountpoints have not. I
used cp to copy some of the data, and fr to do some, seems cp cannot
see a .file!
I missed one run while the disk was being configured. One person said
he had never swapped disks without doing a re-install, but I just
did, and everything seems to be working just fine. Its tedious for
sure, but it can be done.
I have expanded the dumpcycle and runspercycle from 8 to 10 because it
seemed amanda was having a hard time hitting its best balance point.
tapecycle is still 28, but I can add more.
So the disklist is unchanged. Why does amanda want to do a level 0 on
the whole system?
--
Cheers, Gene
AMD K6-III@500mhz 320M
Athlon1600XP@1400mhz 512M
99.27% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com attornies please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2003 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- moved to new disk, now amanda wants to do level 0's on whole system,
Gene Heskett <=
|
|
|