Re: sdlt versus DLT library

Subject:	Re: sdlt versus DLT library
From:	"Steven J. Backus" <backus AT math.utah DOT edu>
To:	amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
Date:	Tue, 15 Jul 2003 10:30:11 -0600 (MDT)

"Kurt Yoder" <kylist AT shcorp DOT com> wrote:

> No. See FAQ:
> 
> http://amanda.sourceforge.net/fom-serve/cache/32.html

How about an amflush?  Say you have more than one tape worth in the
holding disk?

So what does the runtapes parameter do?

Steve

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
sdlt versus DLT library, Jeremy L. Mordkoff Re: sdlt versus DLT library, Niall O Broin Re: sdlt versus DLT library, Kurt Yoder Re: sdlt versus DLT library, Paul Bijnens Re: sdlt versus DLT library, Steven J. Backus <= Re: sdlt versus DLT library, Kurt Yoder Re: sdlt versus DLT library, Jon LaBadie Re: sdlt versus DLT library, Kurt Yoder Re: sdlt versus DLT library, Mitch Collinsworth Re: sdlt versus DLT library, Jon LaBadie

Previous by Date:	Re: chg-multi says no tape online, Kurt Yoder
Next by Date:	Re: sdlt versus DLT library, Kurt Yoder
Previous by Thread:	Re: sdlt versus DLT library, Paul Bijnens
Next by Thread:	Re: sdlt versus DLT library, Kurt Yoder
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]