RE: UPDATE: Still getting timeout: Long entry
2003-05-21 17:24:21
> Is it normal that the "sendbackup" starts more than 1 hour later then
> the sendsize? The estimate time is only a few minutes according to
> your report below.
No, this is not normal. I noticed that my server wasn't just 3 minutes
ahead of my client...it was 1 hour and 3 minutes ahead of my client.
This could be the root of all evil. I spent the morning syncing all of
my times, and hopefully this will eliminate my time problem. Maybe the
two just drifted too far apart to communicate effectively?
>
> And then something completely different.
> Just a problem to investigate... (because it really strange!)
> How big is your holding disk? Is it big enough to hold all
> your images at once? The failing system generates a backup of
> almost 5.5 GB. I know amanda tries to avoid the following
> situation, but it could run into (and I'm not sure how amanda
> 2.4.2p2 reacts) the situation that it is dumping a DLE to
> disk, and the holdingdisk gets full. In that case the dumps
> temporarily stop, amanda waits for taper to finish some more
> DLE's, before the dumpers can continue with transferring
> their data. Could it be there is a timeout (in the
> firewall) that closes idle connections after some time?
> You should see some indication in the amdump.0 file (or
> amdump.1 for previous runs etc) about holdingdisk contention.
>
I had thought of the holding disk issue as well. My total dumpsize
should be 11GB now...my holding disk was at 10GB. I increased it to 20Gb
yesterday, but I still failed this morning. :(
Let's see if syncing my servers fixes it. I got a good manual level 0
dump today...I'll report in tomorrow morning.
Thanks for your help.
|
|
|