Re: bug in disklist?
2003-05-21 15:53:11
> > Bang! Again! Should be wall be repainted?
Yada, yada....
You have fun, and i have got amanda working. Everyone is happy.
> My office mate is wondering just what I was laughing at here. IMHO, he
> wasn't nearly contrite enough when he finally admitted there was no bug.
I dont get the second sentence. I have only a wordlist-translation for
'contrite', similar to 'remorse'. What should your friend feel remorse for?
Perhaps you think that i should feel remorse? Then let me tell you. I dont!
Let us wrap this up and close this thread with a little summary:
1) There is no bug in the interpretation of the exclude-statement in disklist.
Both the 'list' and 'file' options is working.
2) The man-page is correctly describing how it works. Although i believe
that even native-english-speakers need to read it several times before
one can understand what it really means. And with no prior experience
it is difficult.
3) It is confusing to say 'list' when you have a file, and to say 'file'
when you have a list. And i bet that im not the only or the last one to
do the same misinterpretation.
And finally a little script to generate the disklist. It delete files
with '*', so a testrun in a empty directory is recommended. Provided
with the hope that it could be useful for someone else but me.
Cheers! And thanks again for the help.
//Mats
disklist-generator
Description: application/text
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: bug in disklist?, (continued)
- Re: bug in disklist?, Jon LaBadie
- Re: bug in disklist?, Frank Smith
- Re: bug in disklist?, Paul Bijnens
- Re: bug in disklist?, Mats Blomstrand
- Re: bug in disklist?, Paul Bijnens
- Re: bug in disklist?, Joshua Baker-LePain
- Re: bug in disklist?, Joshua Baker-LePain
- Re: bug in disklist?, Gene Heskett
- Re: bug in disklist?,
Mats Blomstrand <=
- Autogenerated disklist files - long [Was Re: bug in disklist?], Paul Bijnens
- Re: Autogenerated disklist files, Mats Blomstrand
|
|
|