On Tuesday 14 January 2003 11:10, Sergio G. Reus wrote:
>> If the log file looks ok, does
>>
>> amreport <config> -l <logfile> -f <outputfile>
>>
>> generate a more reasonable report in <outputfile>, or is it the
>> same report that was mailed to you after the amdump. If the
>> latter, then probably something is wrong with your amreport.
>> Send me a note with your log file attached and I'll see if
>> the amreport's I have here (both 2.42 and 2.4.3) produce the
>> same or different results as your amreport. Also attach your
>> config file.
>>
>> jon
>
>You are right, amreport is not reading the logs properly. When I
>execute:
>
> amreport PRMCompleta -l log -f /tmp/rep.txt
>
>I get the same report than in the mail, and the following errors
> in the standard output:
>
>line 8 of log is bogus
>line 9 of log is bogus
>line 10 of log is bogus
>line 11 of log is bogus
>
>Just the "SUCCESS" lines. But the log file is correct. Judge
> yourself:
>
>START driver date 20030114
>START planner date 20030114
>INFO planner Adding new disk prmb:/etc.
>INFO planner Adding new disk prmb:/u04/copias/enfrio.
>FINISH planner date 20030114
>STATS driver startup time 0.557
>START taper datestamp 20030114 label PRMD-000 tape 0
>SUCCESS dumper prmb /etc 20030114 0 [sec 0.695 kb 448 kps 644.1
> orig-kb 2590] SUCCESS taper prmb /etc 20030114 0 [sec 1.183 kb
> 480 kps 405.7 {wr: writers 15 rdwait 0.000 wrwait 0.023 filemark
> 1.159}] SUCCESS dumper prmb /u04/copias/enfrio 20030114 0 [sec
> 95.896 kb 153312 kps 1598.7 orig-kb 1438450] SUCCESS taper prmb
> /u04/copias/enfrio 20030114 0 [sec 14.429 kb 153344 kps 10627.2
> {wr: writers 4792 rdwait 1.103 wrwait 12.515 filemark 0.760}]
> INFO taper tape PRMD-000 kb 153824 fm 2 [OK]
>FINISH driver date 20030114 time 150.796
>
>I also attatch the config file. Now I'm browsing the reporter.c
> source code, although I hope someone can give an easier solution.
>
>Thanks in advance,
>
>Sergio
Mmm, one question:
Have you more than one installed version of amanda?
The reason I ask is that the normal amanda ./configuration will put
stuff in /usr/local, but the rpm install like from redhat, puts it
in /usr.
Since /usr/local is usually the later thing in the $PATH, the old
stuff might be being found first. Just a thought. Locate will
tell that tale easily enough.
Get the latest version of amanda from Jean-Louis's site at
umontreal, link near the bottom of the amanda.org web page, and
check the ChangeLog, you might find something related there.
Since thats the Jan 4th issue when I last looked last night, and
I've been running that one since the 5th with no problems, you
might even build and install it.
I long ago commited all the ./configuration options to a script so I
can install the new one exactly like the older one I'm overwriting.
I recommend this practice because it protects you from forgetting
what options you gave it the last time you built it. Old coots
like me need all the help in that dept. we can get. :-)
--
Cheers, Gene
AMD K6-III@500mhz 320M
Athlon1600XP@1400mhz 512M
99.22% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
|
