Amanda-Users

Re: amanda 2.4.3 RESULTS MISSING

2003-01-15 09:29:55
Subject: Re: amanda 2.4.3 RESULTS MISSING
From: Gene Heskett <gene_heskett AT iolinc DOT net>
To: "Sergio G. Reus" <sergio.garcia AT f-integra DOT org>, amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 08:45:29 -0500
On Wednesday 15 January 2003 07:24, Sergio G. Reus wrote:
>Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:09:38 -0500 Gene Heskett 
<gene_heskett AT iolinc DOT net>:
>> Mmm, one question:
>>
>> Have you more than one installed version of amanda?
>>
>> The reason I ask is that the normal amanda ./configuration will
>> put stuff in /usr/local, but the rpm install like from redhat,
>> puts it in /usr.
>
>No, I configure it with --prefix=/opt/amanda, so there is no
> posibility of file shuffling.

Well, if locate says your system is clean of older stuff, then that 
was my best shot at it.  You did unpack, configure and make amanda 
as the user amanda, and install as root I assume, so there 
shouldn't be any permissions problems.

I'll have to leave this one to the real experts, I just play one 
occasionally. :-)

>> Get the latest version of amanda from Jean-Louis's site at
>> umontreal, link near the bottom of the amanda.org web page, and
>> check the ChangeLog, you might find something related there.
>> Since thats the Jan 4th issue when I last looked last night, and
>> I've been running that one since the 5th with no problems, you
>> might even build and install it.
>
>I've tried with 2.4.2p2, 2.4.3 stable, 2.4.3-20030104 and
> 2.5.0-20030104. All produce the same amreport results.
>Searching through the code of reporter.c I don't see any function
>more complex than strcmp(), so what is different in my system? (I
> don't think strcmp can be somehow corrupt).
>
>And what is funnier: I forgot changing the tape yesterday, so I
> have had to run amflush, and the report DID get the results:
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>------------- Subject: AMFLUSH MAIL REPORT FOR January 15, 2003
>Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 12:04:55 +0100
>
>The dumps were flushed to tape PRMD-002.
>The next tape Amanda expects to use is: a new tape.
>
>
>STATISTICS:
>                          Total       Full      Daily
>                        --------   --------   --------
>Estimate Time (hrs:min)    0:00
>Run Time (hrs:min)         0:01
>Dump Time (hrs:min)        0:00       0:00       0:00
>Output Size (meg)           0.0        0.0        0.0
>Original Size (meg)         0.0        0.0        0.0
>Avg Compressed Size (%)     --         --         --
>Filesystems Dumped            0          0          0
>Avg Dump Rate (k/s)         --         --         --
>
>Tape Time (hrs:min)        0:00       0:00       0:00
>Tape Size (meg)             0.2        0.0        0.2
>Tape Used (%)               0.0        0.0        0.0  
> (level:#disks ...) Filesystems Taped             2          0    
>      2   (1:2) Avg Tp Write Rate (k/s)    22.0        --       
> 22.0
>
>
>NOTES:
>  taper: tape PRMD-002 kb 160 fm 2 [OK]
>
>
>DUMP SUMMARY:
>                                     DUMPER STATS            TAPER
> STATS HOSTNAME     DISK        L ORIG-KB OUT-KB COMP% MMM:SS 
> KB/s MMM:SS  KB/s --------------------------
> --------------------------------- ------------ prmb         /etc 
>       1     260     96  36.9   N/A   N/A    0:05  18.3 prmb      
>   -ias/enfrio 1      10     64 640.0   N/A   N/A    0:02  31.2
>
>(brought to you by Amanda version 2.4.3)
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>---------
>
>Why amreport invoked by amdump fails to collect the stats and
>invoked by amflush does not?
>
>Sergio
>
>
>[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

-- 
Cheers, Gene
AMD K6-III@500mhz 320M
Athlon1600XP@1400mhz  512M
99.22% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>