Re: dumpcycle-runspercycle-tapecycle
2002-09-11 13:32:33
On Wed Sep 11, 6:52am Gene Heskett wrote:
>But with only 7 tapes, there is a possibility of over-writing the
>last full of that disklist entry with only an incremental as
>amanda gets the scheduling adjusted. No one here would
>recommend only 7 tapes, the murphy style disaster is
>inevitable...
>
>You need at least 14, and I have 20 in my own rotation, so I'm
>always assured that there are at least 2 fulls available in the
>unlikely event a disk goes belly up on me.
I asked Gene for hise amanda.conf entries, which are:
dumpcycle 1 week
runspercycle 7
tapecycle 20
Using this configuration, I understand amanda will schedule
a level 0 each week (dumpcycle). At any one time, you would
have 3 level 0 dumps (in case of tape error, or a dump could
not be restored).
So tapecycle does not need to be a multiple of dumpcycle or
runspercycle?
It's not quite clear what amanda.conf recommends the "extra"
tapes in the tapecycle are for--after amanda has been through
one cycle of the tapes, there are really no more "extra" tapes??
amanda.conf:
tapecycle 19 tapes # the number of tapes in rotation
# 4 weeks (dumpcycle) times 5 tapes per week (just
# the weekdays) plus a few to handle errors that
# need amflush and so we do not overwrite the full
# backups performed at the beginning of the previous
# cycle
TIA<Anne Hammond
University of Colorado at Boulder
|
|
|