Hello,
I agree to 100%!
The text file was the best thing. The new HTML version is unusable.
Bye
Rainer
On 09.07.2014 15:24, Rick Adamson wrote:
> I had the same issue with patches Kurt.
>
> The folders on the FTP site used to have a text document that conveniently
> provided links to the apars addressed in a particular patch, but now they are
> no longer there.
>
> Recently I went to see if a patch or maintenance level was available to
> address a specific issue and then spent an hour trying to find the associated
> documented apars it addressed.
>
> IBM again raised the bar for complicating life as we know it.....thank
> goodness for Google
>
> Rick Adamson
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf
> Of BEYERS Kurt
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 5:54 AM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: [ADSM-L] APARs fixed in TSM 7.1.0.100
>
> Hello everybody,
>
> I'm in the process of upgrading our TSM servers from TSM 6.3.4 to TSM 7.1
> because the latter version is a prerequisite for the Oracle T10000D tape
> drives we will start using. I would have preferred to wait for TSM 7.1.1,
> but that does not fit the into the planning.
>
> I've seen that a patch level 7.1.0.100 is available for download. I've tried
> to find the APAR's that are solved in it, especially for TSM Server, but the
> only thing I've found so far is for the OC:
>
> <copy>
> APARs fixed in level 7.1.0.100
> This interim fix does not include APAR fixes. It updates Operations Center
> V7.1.0 so that you can run the Operations Center on Linux on an IBM Power
> Systems server.
> </copy>
>
> I've also checked the README.html included in the bin file, but their they
> refer only to links towards the Information Center / Knowledge Center.
>
> So does anybody knows the URL where you can find the APAR's fixed for TSM
> 7.1.0.100. If it is restricted towards running the OC in a new environment,
> I'll skip the upgrade. Although the quest to find the fixed APAR's is taking
> longer then the actual install itself would consume.
>
> IBM is getting worse than Oracle, their MOS website is also a jungle where
> you get lost easily. :(
>
> Thanks for any answers in advance!
>
> Best regards,
> Kurt
>
>
> *** Disclaimer ***
> Vlaamse Radio- en Televisieomroeporganisatie Auguste Reyerslaan 52, 1043
> Brussel
>
> nv van publiek recht
> BTW BE 0244.142.664
> RPR Brussel
> http://www.vrt.be/gebruiksvoorwaarden
>
>
|