ADSM-L

Re: Strange behaviour????

2001-10-26 10:10:24
Subject: Re: Strange behaviour????
From: Jerry Caupain <j.caupain AT ONL.PINKROCCADE DOT NL>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 15:52:23 +0200
But why EVERY directory of EVERY system, even the ones that have nothing to do 
with this managementclass?

Why don't all other systems just use the default managementclass?
Do I really need to specify a dirmc for every system in order to get the policy 
I need?

Regards,

Jerry Caupain




>>> Rene.Lambelet AT NESTLE DOT COM 10/26/01 12:05PM >>>
hi,
 
it will be used for directories if the retonly value is the highest in this
DOMAIN,
 
 
 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jerry Caupain [SMTP:j.caupain AT ONL.PINKROCCADE DOT NL] 
> Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:12 AM
> To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU 
> Subject:      Strange behaviour????
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I have noticed something strange. In my policy domain I have two
> management classes. One is called STANDARD and the other is called
> LOG_POLICY-MC. I want to use the last one only for my log server so I
> included the following line in my include/exclude file:
> INclude         /logs/.../*     log_policy-mc
>
> Managementclass STANDARD is the default managementclass.
>
> Why is it that all my other systems also use the LOG_POLICY-MC
> managementclass?  It seems that the directories on my other systems are
> all bound to this managementclass. This can't be normal............can
> it???
>
> Jerry Caupain
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>