Yes, this is perfectly normal. I am guessing that the LOG_POLICY-MC
management class has a RETONLY value equal to or greater than that of your
STANDARD management class. The TSM client binds directories to the
management class with the largest RETONLY setting. If two or more
management classes have the largest RETONLY setting, then it is
undocumented as to which class will be selected.

Regards,

Andy

Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS
Internet e-mail: storman AT us.ibm DOT com

The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
"Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.




Jerry Caupain <j.caupain AT ONL.PINKROCCADE DOT NL>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
10/26/2001 02:12
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"


        To:     ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
        cc:
        Subject:        Strange behaviour????



Hello everyone,

I have noticed something strange. In my policy domain I have two
management classes. One is called STANDARD and the other is called
LOG_POLICY-MC. I want to use the last one only for my log server so I
included the following line in my include/exclude file:
INclude         /logs/.../*     log_policy-mc

Managementclass STANDARD is the default managementclass.

Why is it that all my other systems also use the LOG_POLICY-MC
managementclass?  It seems that the directories on my other systems are
all bound to this managementclass. This can't be normal............can
it???

Jerry Caupain