That's what I wound up doing.



On Fri, 26 Oct 2001, Jerry Caupain wrote:

> But why EVERY directory of EVERY system, even the ones that have nothing to 
> do with this managementclass?
>
> Why don't all other systems just use the default managementclass?
> Do I really need to specify a dirmc for every system in order to get the 
> policy I need?
>
> Regards,
>
> Jerry Caupain
>
>
>
>
> >>> Rene.Lambelet AT NESTLE DOT COM 10/26/01 12:05PM >>>
> hi,
>
> it will be used for directories if the retonly value is the highest in this
> DOMAIN,
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jerry Caupain [SMTP:j.caupain AT ONL.PINKROCCADE DOT NL]
> > Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:12 AM
> > To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> > Subject:      Strange behaviour????
> >
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I have noticed something strange. In my policy domain I have two
> > management classes. One is called STANDARD and the other is called
> > LOG_POLICY-MC. I want to use the last one only for my log server so I
> > included the following line in my include/exclude file:
> > INclude         /logs/.../*     log_policy-mc
> >
> > Managementclass STANDARD is the default managementclass.
> >
> > Why is it that all my other systems also use the LOG_POLICY-MC
> > managementclass?  It seems that the directories on my other systems are
> > all bound to this managementclass. This can't be normal............can
> > it???
> >
> > Jerry Caupain
>