Re: Y2K...!
1998-06-17 10:29:13
The year 2000 is divisible by 4, but by definition millennium years are not
leap years.
-Bob-
>>> Herwig Evenepoel <Herwig.Evenepoel AT KB DOT BE> 06/17/98 08:39AM >>>
>>> Herwig Evenepoel <Herwig.Evenepoel AT KB DOT BE> 06/17/98 08:39AM >>>
Sorry,
But the 29th of february 2000 DOES exist
Herwig Evenepoel
anko AT ISIS.RZ.TU-COTTBUS DOT DE on 17/06/98 15:27:00
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU@Internet
cc: (bcc: Herwig Evenepoel/U29346/KB/KredAlm)
Subject: Re: Y2K...!
Hi,
%If make a query on 01/03/2000 like for example :
%
%q event * * begindate=02/29/2000
"02/29/2000" doesn't exist!!!
Try "01/03/2000" or "02/28/2000"
%Herwig Evenepoel
%CARC
%KBC Bank Belgium
Ciao
A. Kossack
!
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: Y2K...!, (continued)
- Re: Y2K...!, Herwig Evenepoel
- Re: Y2K...!, Robinson, Cris
- Re: Y2K...!, Herwig Evenepoel
- Re: Y2K...!, Andreas Kossack
- Re: Y2K...!, Andreas Landhaeusser
- Re: Y2K...!, Herwig Evenepoel
- Re: Y2K...!, Richard Sims
- Re: Y2K...!, Fred Johanson
- Re: Y2K...!, Herwig Evenepoel
- Re: Y2K...!, Gretchen L. Thiele
- Re: Y2K...!,
Bob Miller <=
- Re: Y2K...!, Andrew Raibeck
- Re: Y2K...!, Richard Sims
- Re: Y2K...!, Fred Johanson
- Re: Y2K...!, Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,FC-SIL/INF.
- Re: Y2K...!, Thomas R Rhodes
- Re: Y2K...!, Nicholas Cassimatis
- Re: Y2K...!, Andrew Raibeck
- Re: Y2K...!, Andrew Raibeck
- Re: Y2K...!, Weeks, Debbie
- Re: Y2K...!, Andrew Raibeck
|
|
|