Re: Y2K...!
1998-06-17 10:06:43
>Sorry,
>
>But the 29th of february 2000 DOES exist
>
>Herwig Evenepoel
>
>
>
>
>
>
>anko AT ISIS.RZ.TU-COTTBUS DOT DE on 17/06/98 15:27:00
>To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU@Internet
>cc: (bcc: Herwig Evenepoel/U29346/KB/KredAlm)
>Subject: Re: Y2K...!
>
>Hi,
>
>%If make a query on 01/03/2000 like for example :
>%
>%q event * * begindate=02/29/2000
>"02/29/2000" doesn't exist!!!
>
>Try "01/03/2000" or "02/28/2000"
>%Herwig Evenepoel
>%CARC
>%KBC Bank Belgium
>
>Ciao
> A. Kossack
Years divisible by 400 are not leapyears.
Fred Johanson
System Administrator
SEA
NSIT
University of Chicago
773-702-8464
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Y2K...!, Bert Geebelen AT cem DOT be
- Re: Y2K...!, Herwig Evenepoel
- Re: Y2K...!, Robinson, Cris
- Re: Y2K...!, Herwig Evenepoel
- Re: Y2K...!, Andreas Kossack
- Re: Y2K...!, Andreas Landhaeusser
- Re: Y2K...!, Herwig Evenepoel
- Re: Y2K...!, Richard Sims
- Re: Y2K...!,
Fred Johanson <=
- Re: Y2K...!, Herwig Evenepoel
- Re: Y2K...!, Gretchen L. Thiele
- Re: Y2K...!, Bob Miller
- Re: Y2K...!, Andrew Raibeck
- Re: Y2K...!, Richard Sims
- Re: Y2K...!, Fred Johanson
- Re: Y2K...!, Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,FC-SIL/INF.
- Re: Y2K...!, Thomas R Rhodes
- Re: Y2K...!, Nicholas Cassimatis
- Re: Y2K...!, Andrew Raibeck
|
|
|