Re: [Veritas-bu] NOM 6.5.

On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Dean <dean.deano AT gmail DOT com> wrote:

Ed,

I'm interested to know how you think NOM contributed to problems on your master. Can you elaborate?

We have an open case with Symantec on our issues right now. However, we also have an EEB in place for nbsl on the master that's causing the grief. We don't know yet if the stock image (on Solaris 10) has the issue or just the EEB.

That's why I'm saying YMMV - I do know that NOM works fine for a lot of folks.

.../Ed

Our master is RHEL4, NOM running on a Win2003 box. NOM is kinda helpful, but, if there is any chance of it causing problems on the master, I will shut down NOM immediately.

Thanks,
Dean

On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 9:57 AM, Ed Wilts <ewilts AT ewilts DOT org> wrote:

On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Andrew White <adwhite AT inchix DOT net> wrote:

I'm just wondering what are peoples thoughts on NOM 6.5? In what capacity are you using NOM (reporting and/or alerting (snmp/email)) and has anyone got it configured in a cluster?

After the Customer Forum in Roseville at the end of October, Erica convinced me to put it up. Although I generally like NOM, we haven't had much success with it and the we've got an open case where it seems to contribute to tipping over our master server (and yes, it's a separate server). Right now, we've got NOM turned off.

YMMV, obviously.
.../Ed

Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewilts AT ewilts DOT org

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

Previous by Date:	[Veritas-bu] WIN32 21 on XP, Akker Henk van den
Next by Date:	Re: [Veritas-bu] Throughput of data domain with Netbackup, Ed Wilts
Previous by Thread:	Re: [Veritas-bu] NOM 6.5., Boris Kraizman
Next by Thread:	Re: [Veritas-bu] NOM 6.5., Rosenkoetter, Gabriel
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]