Veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] NOM 6.5.

2008-11-10 11:11:09
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NOM 6.5.
From: "Rosenkoetter, Gabriel" <Gabriel.Rosenkoetter AT radian DOT biz>
To: "'Dean'" <dean.deano AT gmail DOT com>, "Ed Wilts" <ewilts AT ewilts DOT org>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:29:55 -0500
Ed, if you don't have the EEB for NOM that fixes a memory leak (it's included 
in 6.5.3 and beyond), mention that in your case. I'd have brought this up at 
the quiz the wizards' session if I hadn't had a flight out before then on 
Thursday, so I just left a note about it, which Tim Burlowski (who I'm certain 
reads this list) just followed up on this past week.

According to strings(1), you're after the code branch labeled 
"NetBackup_6.5.2A_EEB1_PET1397478_SET1397396". (I've got the ia64 and PA-RISC 
versions for HP-UX, but so far as I can recall, that won't help you much.)

--
gabriel rosenkoetter
Radian Group Inc, Unix/Linux/VMware Sysadmin / Backup & Recovery
gabriel.rosenkoetter AT radian DOT biz, 215 231 1556


-----Original Message-----
From: Dean [mailto:dean.deano AT gmail DOT com]
Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2008 9:02 PM
To: Ed Wilts
Cc: VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NOM 6.5.

Ed,

I'm interested to know how you think NOM contributed to problems on your 
master. Can you elaborate?

Our master is RHEL4, NOM running on a Win2003 box. NOM is kinda helpful, but, 
if there is any chance of it causing problems on the master, I will shut down 
NOM immediately.

Thanks,
Dean


On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 9:57 AM, Ed Wilts <ewilts AT ewilts DOT org> wrote:


        On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Andrew White <adwhite AT inchix DOT 
net> wrote:



                I'm just wondering what are peoples thoughts on NOM 6.5?  In 
what capacity are you using NOM (reporting and/or alerting (snmp/email)) and 
has anyone got it configured in a cluster?


        After the Customer Forum in Roseville at the end of October, Erica 
convinced me to put it up.  Although I generally like NOM, we haven't had much 
success with it and the we've got an open case where it seems to contribute to 
tipping over our master server (and yes, it's a separate server).  Right now, 
we've got NOM turned off.

        YMMV, obviously.

                    .../Ed

                Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
                ewilts AT ewilts DOT org



        _______________________________________________
        Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
        http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu






_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>