|
Re: [Veritas-bu] NOM 6.5.
2008-11-09 21:14:47
Ed,
I'm interested to know how you think NOM contributed to problems on your master. Can you elaborate?
Our master is RHEL4, NOM running on a Win2003 box. NOM is kinda helpful, but, if there is any chance of it causing problems on the master, I will shut down NOM immediately.
Thanks,
Dean
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 9:57 AM, Ed Wilts <ewilts AT ewilts DOT org> wrote:
I'm just wondering what are peoples thoughts on NOM 6.5? In what capacity are you using NOM (reporting and/or alerting (snmp/email)) and has anyone got it configured in a cluster?
After the Customer Forum in Roseville at the end of October, Erica convinced me to put it up. Although I generally like NOM, we haven't had much success with it and the we've got an open case where it seems to contribute to tipping over our master server (and yes, it's a separate server). Right now, we've got NOM turned off.
YMMV, obviously.
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewilts AT ewilts DOT org
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
|
|
|
