Re: [Networker] Future of Networker
2010-08-14 06:46:50
My understanding is that Microsoft forces VSS backups upon us for Windows 2008
systems.
As for Windows clusters. I would not want to see that feature removed. I don't
know about other NetWorker users, but it is a feature I use and it works fine.
On Aug 14, 2010, at 1:21 AM, David Stes wrote:
>> It would be great to get people's input on other desired features
>> or enhancements. Product management will gather that input to inform
>> upcoming releases.
>
> I'd like to ask to keep things simple, and avoid too many features.
>
> There's one question: which features to add.
>
> But there is also the delicate question: which features to REMOVE.
>
> Examples:
> 1) how to disable the VSS 'feature' on W2008?
> this 'VSS support feature' is more like a bug in W2008
> there's no incremental VSS backups for system save sets,
> so I'd rather disable the feature, remove it from NetWorker
>
> the base NetWorker product could be VSS unaware,
> and for example if you like VSS, you could put all of VSS in NMM
>
> 2) the 'nsrauth' feature gives certificate support
> but does somebody really NEED this ? Looks like everybody uses oldauth.
> I have the impression that everybody is disabling certificate support
>
> So the nsrauth feature could be removed?
>
> 3) Windows cluster support: the feature that NW supports the cluster;
> sometimes it feels like a bug, would be nice to run NW cluster unaware
>
> The problem that I see with adding more and more features that somebody
> thinks would be nice, is that it also has undesired side-effects.
>
> For example 'nsrauth' - even if you disable it and use 'oldauth'
> it still, in some cases, requires the correct OpenSSL shared libs to
> be present, even if you use 'oldauth'.
>
> Besides, the example of the 'nsrauth' feature is perhaps a good example,
> who really needs this feature (on this list)? Just curious ...
>
> It just makes the product more difficult to install, less portable ...
>
> DAvid.
>
> To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
> type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
> networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with
> this list. You can access the archives at
> http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
> via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Networker] Future of Networker, (continued)
Re: [Networker] Future of Networker, Thierry FAIDHERBE
Re: [Networker] Future of Networker, Morton, Jeffrey
Re: [Networker] Future of Networker, George Sinclair
Re: [Networker] Future of Networker, David Stes
- Re: [Networker] Future of Networker,
STANLEY R. HORWITZ <=
Re: [Networker] Future of Networker, David Stes
Re: [Networker] Future of Networker, Macina, Conrad
Re: [Networker] Future of Networker, David Stes
Re: [Networker] Future of NetWorker, David Stes
Re: [Networker] Future of NetWorker, Rich Graves
Re: [Networker] Future of NetWorker, David Stes
|
|
|