Rich Graves <rgraves AT CARLETON DOT EDU> wrote:

What versions/platforms are you using? I see no such problem on 7.5.3 or
7.4, 32-bit or 64-bit, platforms RHEL or Solaris.

# ldd /usr/sbin/nsrd | grep ssl
       libcommonssl.so =>       /usr/lib/nsr/amd64/libcommonssl.so
       libssl.so.0.9.7 =>       /usr/sfw/lib/amd64/libssl.so.0.9.7
       libssl_extra.so.0.9.7 =>         /usr/sfw/lib/amd64/libssl_extra.so.0.9.7

It's rather whether the feature 'nsrauth' is really something that somebody 
really needs.

Maybe some features are added without a real need for it.

I'm not saying that nsrauth doesn't work, it works fine, but who really, really 
needs it?

The feature that I'd like to ask for is, is simple and portable software, 
without too many features,
small size of binaries, not too many unnecessary features ?

David.

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type 
"signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to networker-request 
AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this list. You can access the 
archives at http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER