Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?
2010-03-19 18:09:19
In regard to: Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, George Sinclair said (at...:
If NetWorker actually knows about the type of drive you have, then I
would just leave volume default capacity alone.
Well, one reason would be that if on average you're getting 2:1 compression
then NW will report the tape at 100% when it's only written, say, half of
what it will end up writing, right?
That's true, but I guess I don't consider that a useful reason to change
the default volume capacity. There's no guarantee that you're going to
get 2:1 compression on any particular set of data, so why change the
default volume capacity, assuming you will? What have you gained by
changing it? Now you have some tapes that say "99% used" when they're
full?
Or are you assuming 2:1 compression and using the 800 MB/tape number to
track jukebox capacity?
Tim
--
Tim Mooney Tim.Mooney AT ndsu DOT
edu
Enterprise Computing & Infrastructure 701-231-1076 (Voice)
Room 242-J6, IACC Building 701-231-8541 (Fax)
North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105-5164
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type
"signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to networker-request
AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this list. You can access the
archives at http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Networker] Volume capacity?, George Sinclair
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, A Darren Dunham
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, Tim Mooney
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, George Sinclair
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, Tim Mooney
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, Len Philpot
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, George Sinclair
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, Tim Mooney
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, Preston de Guise
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, George Sinclair
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?,
Tim Mooney <=
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, A Darren Dunham
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, Tim Mooney
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, George Sinclair
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, A Darren Dunham
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, Tim Mooney
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, A Darren Dunham
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, Len Philpot
|
|
|