Re: [Networker] NetWorker host: Solaris vs. Windows vs. Linux
2009-03-05 08:27:17
Generally, I agree in making minimal changes. For me, it's all one big
change. I'm new to both Solaris and NetWorker. Since I'm more familiar
with Windows, and being that I'm the one that's responsible for the
enterprise backup system, I thought this would be a good opportunity to
eliminate one unknown for me (Solaris) and concentrate learning efforts on
just NetWorker.
There may be good reasons as to why not to go to a Windows platform or to
make these two changes. That's what's prompted me to post to this list.
I'm hoping to learn from others experience before making some colossal
mistakes...
-Tom
On Wed, 4 Mar 2009 19:10:37 -0500, David Magda <dmagda AT EE.RYERSON DOT CA>
wrote:
>On Mar 4, 2009, at 13:58, Tom Birkenbach wrote:
>> I'm going to be doing an upgrade from NetWorker v7.3.2 on Solaris 8 to
>> v7.4.x on new hardware. I'm thinking of changing the OS to Windows
>> Server 2008.
>
>Any reason why you're changing two elements (NetWorker version and OS)
>at the same time? Personally I try to avoid this and try to only make
>a single change at a time whenever possible.
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
|
|