[Networker] NetWorker host: Solaris vs. Windows vs. Linux
2009-03-13 04:50:50
[Going off-topic for a bit, as this may be important for others on T2000 et al
servers.]
Sorry, I don't have documentation, only test results.
Unfortunately, the solution to our problem is "install/re-jump from 10/08 and
install latest cluster / firmware.' Which is what I'm doing with our
replacement NW Server as I type this. Argh.
Patching a 5/08 install with latest cluster did not work; I don't know about
using latest cluster on 8/07, since we don't have any T2K on it that I know of.
We have one on 6/06, patched to 5/08, but he's experiencing different issues
(which I think is with an app, not Solaris).
The reason for the problem is Sun changing the 'core' driver on T* server
networking ports from nge to e1000g. The initial implementation on 5/08 was
generating a bunch of internal interrupts / retransmit requests (apparently for
no reason) and throttling the speed.
Note that we also had cases of x4600 and x4100 servers with the same problem on
net2-3 (which were nge on the M2 versions). T1000 does not have the problem,
since it does not use nge.
--TSK
Rachel Polanskis wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Mar 2009, tkimball wrote:
>
>
> > Solaris 10 is mostly rock solid. Just don't install 5/08 or patch to it
> > (in particular if a T2000 or similar is involved). A network change (for
> > consistent network drivers) was horribly bugged, and throughput went into
> > the gutter on the T2K. The 10/08 release fixed it enough to make me happy
> > to continue.
> >
>
> Hi,
> can you please shed more light on the T2000 issue?
>
> We are using T2000's in various ways and are experiencing the
> horrible throughput issues you describe without resolution.
>
> We run a T5220 with Solaris 10 8/07 for Legato and so far it's doing fine
> but our 20 or so T2000's are not all working very well at all
> throughput wise, with Zones dropping off, sluggish response,
> java performance etc.... and they are all patched towards 5/08.....
>
> If you could steer me to more documented info I'd be very grateful!
>
> rachel
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
|This was sent by t.s.kimball AT gmail DOT com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- Re: [Networker] NetWorker host: Solaris vs. Windows vs. Linux, (continued)
|
|
|