Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Aptare vs. NB 6.0 NOM reporting

2006-08-10 22:39:05
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Aptare vs. NB 6.0 NOM reporting
From: Tristan.Ball at vsl.com.au (Tristan Ball)
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 12:39:05 +1000
I found NOM to be painfully buggy, and it's reporting structure to be a
little inflexible. That said, it does store everything in a SQL
database, so with a little bit of work, you can get access to that and
use any sql reporting software you like.

 

T

 

  _____  

From: veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Hindle,
Greg
Sent: Friday, 11 August 2006 4:19 AM
To: NB List Mail
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Aptare vs. NB 6.0 NOM reporting

 

We are looking at reporting software for Netbackup. We are looking at
Storage Console from Aptare. But I  understand 6.0 with Nom also has
reporting built in. We are currently running 5.0 mp6 but are planning to
upgrade to 6.0. Is anyone using NOM and the reporting feature? Is it
better than Aptare? Views? Opinions?

Greg 

>>> This e-mail and any attachments are confidential, may contain legal,
professional or other privileged information, and are intended solely
for the
addressee.  If you are not the intended recipient, do not use the
information
in this e-mail in any way, delete this e-mail and notify the sender.
CEG-IP2
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20060811/a99f8d8e/attachment-0001.html