Re: [Networker] index default browse and retention

Subject:

From:

Davina Treiber <Davina.Treiber AT PEEVRO.CO DOT UK>

To:

Date:

Wed, 19 Mar 2008 21:49:26 +0000

Michael Nored wrote:
> I also agree that resetting the individual save set retention and browse

> period will work fine in most cases but I can see that being an issuein a> large environment as you could be talking about thousands of savesets. As> for as deleting savesets that haven't reached their expiration date Iwould

> have to question why they were on the same tape with savesets that have a

> shorter retention period. That being said I agree with you if you aremixing> savesets with varying retention periods on the same tapes thendeleting the

> tapes will not work

Mixing save sets with different retention periods would not be wise - Iagree.

That was not what I meant though, I was referring to having full savesets which have dependencies on them from later incremental or levelbackups.


To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type 
"signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to networker-request 
AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this list. You can access the 
archives at http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

Re: [Networker] Volume Name <unlabeled> after jukebox upgrade, David Dulek

Next by Date:

Re: [Networker] Determine how long a job ran for ?, Scott Harney

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Networker] index default browse and retention, Michael Nored

Next by Thread:

Re: [Networker] index default browse and retention, Michael Nored

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]