On 11/26/2014 08:39 AM, Bill Arlofski wrote:

> ---[ tl;dr verson ]---
> When considering volumes for the expected volume of an upcoming job, Bacula
> appears to be ignoring the Job/JobDef options:
> 
>   Full Backup Pool =
>   Incremental Backup Pool =
>   Differential Backup Pool =
> 
> And only considers volumes from the "Pool = " line in the Job/JobDefs.

No help here but I had it go (using your naming) from c0_0005_0067 to
c0_0006_0067 instead of c0_0005_0068 after a problem of some kind (I
forget what, exactly).

That was with only one pool, so I wonder if the problem is in the
JobDefs. My impression is bacula's algorithm for choosing next volume is
fcsked up beyond understanding.

-- 
Dimitri Maziuk
Programmer/sysadmin
BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more
Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157005751&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk

_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users