Bacula-users
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [Bacula-users] base backups increase backup duration for full backups considerably

2012-11-29 12:48:16
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] base backups increase backup duration for full backups considerably
From: Felix Schwarz <felix.schwarz AT oss.schwarz DOT eu>
To: bacula-users <bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 18:45:50 +0100 
I'm now using a workaround: I generated a list of "big" files and defined a
separate fileset for the base job. With that approach I don't reduce the
necessary space that much but the full backup only takes 0:45 (which is about
½ of a full backup without base job).

Still I think base jobs with lots of files could be optimized a lot.

fs

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keep yourself connected to Go Parallel: 
VERIFY Test and improve your parallel project with help from experts 
and peers. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [Bacula-users] disaster recovery of the actual bacula server, Jérôme Blion
Next by Date:  [Bacula-users] bacula fatal error all the time, b_rom
Previous by Thread:  [Bacula-users] base backups increase backup duration for full backups considerably (was: Re: Bacula director consumes all CPU after full backup), Felix Schwarz
Next by Thread:  Re: [Bacula-users] Splitting a job into two parallel jobs, lst_hoe02
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]