Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] (no subject)

2012-11-29 10:41:58
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] (no subject)
From: lst_hoe02 AT kwsoft DOT de
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:39:27 +0100
Zitat von "Luis H. Forchesatto" <luisforchesatto AT gmail DOT com>:

> Good morning Andreas.
>
> In my case both machines (client and storage/director) are linux OS. They
> are at the same network and the backup are transported via network. I think
> that way is better to keep one job per server, am I right?
>
> Thanks for answering me. :)

If you have more than one I/O channel (multiple disk(s)) and your  
network is not saturated from one job you can try if your Bacula  
server (SD) is able to handle another one concurrently with raising  
throughput. No problem with Unix (Linux) but not usefull in all cases.

Regards

Andreas



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keep yourself connected to Go Parallel: 
VERIFY Test and improve your parallel project with help from experts 
and peers. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>